Imperial Twilight

Imperial Twilight

The Opium War and the End of China's Last Golden Age

Book - 2018
Average Rating:
Rate this:
2
Describes how nineteenth-century British efforts to open China to trade set in motion the fall of the Qing dynasty and started a war that allowed for the rise of nationalism and communism in the twentieth century.
Publisher: New York :, Alfred A. Knopf,, 2018
©2018
Edition: First edition
Copyright Date: ©2018
ISBN: 9780307961730
0307961737
9780345803023
0345803027
Branch Call Number: 951.033 Platt
Characteristics: xxviii, 556 pages :,illustrations, maps ;,25 cm

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment
3
369bestseller
Aug 30, 2019

The book was well-researched. Platt systematically illustrated two sides of the issue and viewpoints and concluded with his own point of view on the Opium War (1839-1842,) a war he considered could have been avoided, a point he repeatedly emphasized. Yet throughout the 556 pages, he missed the most crucial point by not probing the fundamental question: “Was the Opium War a just war?”
Despite illustrating all the different views expressed from the two countries, this very question was ignored. Instead he ended his last numerous pages criticizing the Chinese Imperial Commissioner Lin Zexu for not giving Elliot, the British Superintendent in Canton, a chance to prevent the war. In his view, Elliot had tried to avoid a war (in my view, a war should not even have been raised in the first place.) And Lin was painted as the cause of an avoidable war—for confiscating a massive quantity of contraband opium, threatening to execute the British smugglers and the shutting down the trade at length. In fact, Lin Zexu was dutifully enforcing the laws of the very land where the Indian opium was trafficked by the British in a frightful quantity—according to Platt, it reached 18,956 chests in the early 1830’s. (It’s no different from how Pablo Escobar was put behind bars and eventually killed for smuggling Colombian cocaine into the United States. What if the Colombian government had backed Escobar instead and had invaded the United States? Would we look for excuses to justify the Colombian government’s action?) This made Lin Zexu truly “the pioneer in the war against drugs” as was inscribed on the pedestal of his granite statue in New York’s Chinatown. But in Platt’s conclusion, Lin was the cause of the Opium war; in the end, it sounded like the Chinese were to blame. And Platt was cautious, cleverly quoting words from a Chinese scholar to prove his point.
I do not agree with Platt’s “If Only” theory of history. I don’t believe the war could have been avoided. Even if the British had not invaded China in 1939, they would eventually have found other excuses, like how they launched the second Opium War in 1860 and later another war in 1899.
As for the name of the war—the Chinese have called it the “Opium War” since the Republic revolution in 1911, a name that couldn’t be more appropriate. But I rarely saw this name being used in most English language history books until the seventies. It took Western historians more than a century to use its rightful name—Opium War. I noticed, thankfully, that Platt not only used it in the sub-title of his book, but also throughout the text.

p
petermerry
Sep 25, 2018

This book is very readable. It gave me a new perspective on China in the 19th century.

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at my library

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top